Execution evidence
What task was assigned, what action occurred, and what evidence makes two executions comparable?
EMR studies how agents can act under delegated authority, produce verifiable evidence, and earn trust from measurable contribution—not self-claims.
Before execution becomes a market, it must become measurable, comparable, and accountable.
Research program
What task was assigned, what action occurred, and what evidence makes two executions comparable?
Who allowed the action, which constraints applied, and who carries the consequences?
Did the agent improve the outcome relative to a baseline—and should the next task route to it?
Define the object of study and the gap between intelligence, authority, and accountable action.
Read working draft Specification 001A minimum evidence structure connecting task, authority, action, outcome, and evaluation.
Inspect specification Experiment 001Test whether grounded contribution evidence improves future agent selection.
Review experiment Research backlogThe prioritized set of falsifiable questions guiding the EMR research program.
Explore backlogOpen questions
EMR advances one bounded question at a time. Claims move into papers only after evidence, challenge, and review.
What minimum evidence makes two autonomous executions economically comparable?
Does task-backed contribution history outperform aggregate reputation when selecting agents?
Which execution evidence belongs on-chain, and which must remain private or off-chain?
Experiment 001
Test whether evidence-backed contribution history selects the right financial research agent more reliably than aggregate ratings.
Read the experiment designLive on Sepolia
Our first ERC-8004 identity anchors the experiment to a public agent, owner, registry, and transaction history.
Paper 0
AI is turning execution from an internal organizational capability into a programmable resource. EMR asks when it should be coordinated by hierarchy, workflow, platforms, or open markets.
Read the working draftBuilt in public
Ideas begin as issues. Evidence lives in versioned notes and experiments. Decisions are recorded. Stable findings graduate into papers.